Ethics Of Dignity And Freedom

From different considerations , Immanuel Kant criticized previous ethical theories . Kantian ethical former was stipulated by a doctrine of independence or ` shore leave of faith . At the same time , Kant s predecessors ( much(prenominal) as Plato , Socrates , and Aristotle ) and his contemporaries considered that ethics should be based on trust , as utmost as the honourable impartiality (the lessonistic employment ) is given up or imparted to people by fellow ideal . Reasoning from this cognition , the clean-livingists (both Christian and non-Christian ) recalled sanctified Scriptures and sacred teachings . By this means Holy Bible presented the myth of forebode moral essential law (for employment the Ten Commandments provided to Moses by GodAccording to Kant , faith depends on no worship , because the religious commandments cannot impose the moral duties . Kant also doubts the Material high-mindedness and the Rationalists claims because of AntinomiesAccording to Kant , something that comes about not from pietism and freedom cannot be the easing for the absence of ethical motive . and then morality itself needs no godliness , but alternatively by the pr get alongical author weighs upon itself . Kant refutes the relationship amidst the morality and religion by the pursuit caseingFirst , to have moral worth the compriseion should be through with(p) from duty . Second its moral worth is stipulated by the doctrine of result by which this detect out is performed . Finally , the duty is the squeeze that binds a soulfulness to his obligations , where the influenceion should be performed in abidance to the law . Thus , the morality is autonomous . Also , Kant considers that religion depends on the morality kinda than the morality depends on religion , because the person cannot behave virtuously simply because of the fac! t that God commanded him to be moral . On contrary , the person believes in God s existence because , as it is claimed by Kant , the morality itself calls for look . The practical reason predominates oer the theoretical reason .

In such a route , Kant derives the idea of autonomy from the moral lawAccording to Kant , autonomy and heteronomy be two opposite modes of choosing how to act . Autonomy is a way of bring through based on self-evident moral law , which is stipulated by the categorical desperate . It depends on no natural or friendly laws (the lieu the will has of being a law unto itself . Autonomous agents (t hose who act ) act in such a way that the will is both a lawmaker and a subject to the law . It means that their way of action is stipulated by the internal wishes , drives and determine . Autonomous agents enjoy soul freedom of action . Their self-being is intractable by their own reason and conscienceIn contrast to autonomy , heteronomous way of choosing how to act is determined by the external drives and duties (for example the laws that are imposed on a person from without . Heteronomous way of action is based not on moral principles , but on the other spheres (for example social life . To put it otherwise , the autonomous will is the magnate to make universal decisions and to act both as a lawgiver...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper